Something went wrong
Try again later.
Hostel Part II
Three young Americans studying in Rome set off for a weekend trip when they run into a beautiful model from one of their art classes. They are lured to a Slovakian hostel, and discover the grim reality behind it.
14 January 1975, Hollywood, Los Angeles, California, USA
15 October 1956, Valtice, Czechoslovakia [now Czech Republic]
24 December 1948, Bône, Constantine, France [now Annaba, Algeria]
1 February 1978, Jilemnice, Czechoslovakia [now Czech Republic]
30 July 1958, Montclair, New Jersey, USA
14 July 1938, Tallinn, Estonia
18 March 1976, Sheffield, Yorkshire, England, UK
December 15, 2010
Gory torture bloodbath checks in for another stay.
August 27, 2009
Poseur callousness all the way
June 09, 2007
Hostel: Part II offers more hard-core horror and an even more outspoken message [than the first].
July 03, 2008
This second film definitely shows Roth's absolute courage as a director. He didn't pull any punches with this follow up.
August 28, 2015
A tight-fisted slow burn that whacks you in face with two or three really horrifying sequences.
July 23, 2008
Filmmaker Eli Roth tries to enliven the formula, but this sequel loses the grim surprise of the original without adding much new in terms of plotting or gory set pieces.
June 16, 2007
Both nubile females and alpha-male douche bags are on the receiving end of pain (that's supposed to nullify accusations of misogyny, is it?), but really, we're all the victims here.
July 07, 2010
There are some grisly deaths gore hounds would approve of, but the focus is more on the motives of the murderous pervs and the inner workings of the snuff corporation.
June 09, 2007
There's a keen intelligence behind all that gleeful degradation and it pays off in a finish that's at once ironic, satirical, and perversely satisfying.
June 13, 2007
Eli Roth's Hostel: Part II is an authentic real-world creep show -- better, if anything, than its predecessor.
October 23, 2007
Roth's dark humor and lacerating view of human weakness sometimes suggest George Romero; what he lacks is Romero's stubborn belief in personal morality.
June 12, 2007
The movie is almost totally devoid of suspense, which is one of the marks of a true exploitation film. Why waste time with a bunch of false scares and tension, when you can go straight to the pain and suffering?