Something went wrong
Try again later.
Double Jeopardy
The case of a woman named Libby Parsons is still under way and is the woman who was framed to kill her husband in recent years. The Libby trial began, with many years in prison. Libby still has two burning desires: finding her son and solving her controversial case. Libby suspects that her husband is still alive and is therefore trying to reach him. Libby thinks she has already been tried for the crime, so she can not be sued if she finds and kills him. There seems to be ambiguity about that issue.
13 March 1971, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
1954, Canada
13 May 1926, Findlater, Saskatchewan, Canada
22 March 1969, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
24 March 1975, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
20 September 1976, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
12 August 1956, Noranda, Québec, Canada
25 April 1939, Toronto, Canada
21 February 1961, Abbeyville, South Carolina, USA
5 November 1962, California, USA
July 16, 2004
Double Jeoprady has all the legal savvy of the O.J. Simpson jury.February 08, 2003
This film takes a potentially interesting premise and makes some mistakes that result in a faulty final product.January 01, 2000
One of the dumbest chase thrillers ever to stumble onto the big screen!April 07, 2001
Implausible and contrived...it's "The Fugitive," complete with Tommy Lee Jones in essentially the same role.February 14, 2005
The way the screenwriters treat the law is in many ways similar to way they treat intelligence of the viewers.September 26, 2001
This bone-weary material would barely make for a passable episode of Diagnosis: Murder.January 01, 2000
Double Jeopardy is single-minded and engaging thriller storytelling without an afterglow.June 23, 2004
The script, not rooted in logic, leaves certain plot elements unexplained. And when the ending arrives, it's no surprise.January 01, 2000
Ms. Judd looks too dainty to throw herself into anything more reckless than a manicure.January 01, 2000
Beresford's straight-ahead approach to the material, as a heart-tugger, is 180 degrees wrong.January 01, 2000
A lukewarm outing that mostly just bops from plot point to plot point.January 01, 2000
It has no subtlety, no shadings, and no suspense, and might as well not have a screenplay.